Questions, continued, a.k.a. Making Pink

We think that getting an education is all about answering questions when it’s really all about asking them. That’s because questions help focus and sharpen our thinking. Answers just stop it cold. As Paul and Elder1 state, “Feeding students endless content to remember… is akin to repeatedly stepping on the brakes in a vehicle that is, unfortunately, already at rest.”

Questions, Paul and Elder continue, “determine where our thinking goes” (p. 62). Scientists would never get anywhere if all they did was collect facts. Instead, they ask questions such as “What other uses can we put this drug to?” “Why does Washington State have an inordinate number of cases of multiple sclerosis?” “How can we send a man to the moon?”

Interestingly, not all questions are created equal, especially in terms of critical thinking. Let’s take Bloom’s Taxonomy, that 60-year-old warhorse of a classification system that divides thinking into levels of cognitive difficulty. Recalling knowledge, a.k.a. remembering, as it is called by some, is at the bottom. Unfortunately, that’s where most of our education is stuck—stuffing facts down our students’ gullets. No question that facts are necessary. But what good are they if we don’t question their validity, hidden assumptions, and logic, or ultimately connect them to the big picture?

Here is the graph that shows the various levels Bloom outlines:

Blooms taxonomy1

I have attached a PowerPoint presentation in which I apply Bloom’s cognitive levels to Goldilocks and the Three Bears (with a great deal of help from http://courseweb.unt.edu/gmayes/documents/Blooms_Taxonomy.html).

For comparison, look in the PowerPoint presentation at the questions I developed for “The Global Child,” an essay (on tape) in National Public Radio’s excellent series, Raise the Issues. You can do this for any text you want. Better yet, have students do it on their own.

At the beginning of the PowerPoint, you will also see the slide below of paint cans with the question, How do I make pink? Behind the question is a story told by Indiana-based artist Marvin Bartel. He told me he teaches critical thinking by asking questions of elementary kids in his art classes. Really? I asked. Critical thinking in elementary school? In art class??? It made perfect sense after he explained it.

Paint cans

Consider this scenario. If a child comes to you and wants to know how to make pink, you have two choices. You can tell her how to do it, or you can say, What do you think? By choosing the second approach, the child is then free to hypothesize and experiment (i.e., analyze and create). Yes, she may get it wrong the first couple of times. But if you give her the information, she will have no opportunity to develop those higher level processes. If allowed to experiment, she becomes invested in the answer and begins to rely on herself for information. It’s so simple, and yet so powerful.

And speaking of questions, what kinds are you asking in your classes? I think you’ll find that the higher you climb on Bloom’s cognitive steps by asking questions that employ those cognitive skills, the more engaged students become.

Socrates was killed in 399 BC because those in power thought he was corrupting youth by encouraging them to question the status quo. So don’t think questions aren’t powerful. They are the very antidote we need against muddled thinking and seductive propaganda.

1Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2007). The thinker’s guide to the art of Socratic questioning. Dillon Beach, Calif.: Foundation for Critical Thinking.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s